Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

CHICAGO POLICE ACCUSED OF COOKING LOWER CRIME STATS

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • CHICAGO POLICE ACCUSED OF COOKING LOWER CRIME STATS

    CHICAGO POLICE ACCUSED OF COOKING LOWER CRIME STATS

    by WARNER TODD HUSTON 20 Apr 2014 289 POST A COMMENT



    A loud debate about crime statistics is taking place in Chicago as 2014 gets underway. The Police Department is claiming that it has helped lower crime, as statistics are down all across the board over last year. But others claim that the ultra cold and snowy Winter weather Chicago just experienced is what held crime down, not any particular efforts by the Chicago PD. More ominously, others say the police are actually cooking the stats.

    Last week, Chicago Police Superintendent Garry McCarthy claimed that his department was "making progress" on defeating crime and pointed to the lower rates as proof.
    Not everyone is accepting McCarthy's claims as given.

    Many say the weather was the main factor, not the police. Their case is bolstered by the fact that during the first weekend of the year favored by moderate weather, violence in Chicago exploded with 35 shootings in only 36 hours.

    But others see something more nefarious in the falling crime rates than just an oppressive Winter. A new investigative report by Chicago Magazine claims that Mayor Emanuel and Superintendent McCarthy are cooking the stats to make it appear that crime is falling when in fact it is not.
    The magazine says that murders and violent crimes are being reported in ways that hide them from accumulated statistics.

    In one case, for instance, a woman was murdered but because her corpse had so many different injuries the coroner couldn't determine exactly which one killed her. But instead of classifying the death as a murder, the Chicago police classified the death as a "noncriminal death." How could a clear murder be called a "noncriminal death"? According to police, it was because they coroner didn't specify what injury killed her.

    "With the stroke of a computer key, she was airbrushed out of Chicago’s homicide statistics," Chicago Magazine notes.

    In another case a man was found severely beaten. He died a few days after being taken to the hospital. Instead of classifying his death as a result of a criminal act, police classified the cause of his death as “diabetes.”

    These weren't the only cases the magazine found, either.

    "We identified 10 people... who were beaten, burned, suffocated, or shot to death in 2013 and whose cases were reclassified as death investigations, downgraded to more minor crimes, or even closed as noncriminal incidents—all for illogical or, at best, unclear reasons," the article says.

    The authors also found the same "troubling practice" in the reporting of other crimes, "including serious felonies such as robberies, burglaries, and assaults, that were misclassified, downgraded to wrist-slap offenses, or made to vanish altogether."

    It was all a "betrayal of public trust," the authors wrote.

    Superintendent McCarthy called the article "patently false" and he said the reliance on anonymous sources discredits the findings. "I'm troubled by it because it hurts our credibility while we're trying to build our credibility," Chicago's top cop said.
    Breitbart
    "Alexa, slaughter the fatted calf."

  • #2
    This was kicked off by this article, which is quite the damning indictment. The next installment is due out in a couple of weeks, and I'm looking forward to reading it.
    It's been ten years since that lonely day I left you
    In the morning rain, smoking gun in hand
    Ten lonely years but how my heart, it still remembers
    Pray for me, momma, I'm a gypsy now

    Comment


    • #3
      Something had to go inversely down to offset the huge Obamacare numbers.
      Science that cannot be questioned is propaganda.

      Cameras in classrooms now.

      Comment


      • #4
        I don't get how someone can die of being beaten and stabbed but it's "non-criminal" because the fatal injury can't be identified. How is that logical?
        "Alexa, slaughter the fatted calf."

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Gingersnap View Post
          I don't get how someone can die of being beaten and stabbed but it's "non-criminal" because the fatal injury can't be identified. How is that logical?
          I can see how and why that might be a logical conclusion in a sane society (which Chicago obviously is not).

          You find a woman's body. It's clear that the dead person's skull has been busted wide open. You have no idea why, though: there is nothing that remotely resembles a murder weapon, there is no specific evidence that another person caused this damage, and you have no method of determining what precisely crushed this person's skull. There's no evidence of any person having any sort of grudge against her or any other motive for murder. Everyone she possibly knows has an iron-clad alibi.

          What do you do with such a case? There's no one to charge. You can't present to the grand jury that "someone" bashed in this person's skull, with no apparent motive, no murder weapon, no evidence. You can't even demonstrate to a grand jury that a crime has been committed (the primary function of a grand jury). You can't even demonstrate that it was a person who caused her head to be bashed in. What do you call such a situation, if not a "non-criminal unexplained death?"

          The problem here is that Chicago authorities are clearly moving cases that are obviously murder into the "unknown" category. It's one thing to say that a mysterious something caused a death. It's something else entirely to say that someone who is found tied to a chair in an abandoned office with three GSWs to the chest might have died from anything other than a human cause.
          It's been ten years since that lonely day I left you
          In the morning rain, smoking gun in hand
          Ten lonely years but how my heart, it still remembers
          Pray for me, momma, I'm a gypsy now

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Adam View Post
            I can see how and why that might be a logical conclusion in a sane society (which Chicago obviously is not).

            You find a woman's body. It's clear that the dead person's skull has been busted wide open. You have no idea why, though: there is nothing that remotely resembles a murder weapon, there is no specific evidence that another person caused this damage, and you have no method of determining what precisely crushed this person's skull. There's no evidence of any person having any sort of grudge against her or any other motive for murder. Everyone she possibly knows has an iron-clad alibi.

            What do you do with such a case? There's no one to charge. You can't present to the grand jury that "someone" bashed in this person's skull, with no apparent motive, no murder weapon, no evidence. You can't even demonstrate to a grand jury that a crime has been committed (the primary function of a grand jury). You can't even demonstrate that it was a person who caused her head to be bashed in. What do you call such a situation, if not a "non-criminal unexplained death?"

            The problem here is that Chicago authorities are clearly moving cases that are obviously murder into the "unknown" category. It's one thing to say that a mysterious something caused a death. It's something else entirely to say that someone who is found tied to a chair in an abandoned office with three GSWs to the chest might have died from anything other than a human cause.
            I can see that. I had a FOAF who died mysteriously on a hiking thing. He was alone. He got chewed up but his real cause of death (months later) was a wasp sting. The guy didn't know he'd have that reaction, had never been stung, and died. Bears sort of ate parts of him but no bears killed him.

            A stab wound on top of a beat down? Probably not a super creative suicide.
            "Alexa, slaughter the fatted calf."

            Comment

            Working...
            X