Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A truly excellent article by Kareem Abdul-Jabbar

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A truly excellent article by Kareem Abdul-Jabbar




    It's time to look at ourselves — and our collective moral outrage — in the mirror, says former NBA player Kareem Abdul-Jabbar.



    Moral outrage is exhausting. And dangerous. The whole country has gotten a severe case of carpal tunnel syndrome from the newest popular sport of Extreme Finger Wagging. Not to mention the neck strain from Olympic tryouts for Morally Superior Head Shaking. All over the latest in a long line of rich white celebrities to come out of the racist closet. (Was it only a couple days ago that Cliven Bundy said blacks would be better off picking cotton as slaves? And only last June Paula Deen admitted using the “N” word?)

    Yes, I’m angry, too, but not just about the sins of Donald Sterling. I’ve got a list. But let’s start with Sterling. I used to work for him, back in 2000 when I coached for the Clippers for three months. He was congenial, even inviting me to his daughter’s wedding. Nothing happened or was said to indicate he suffered from IPMS (Irritable Plantation Master Syndrome). Since then, a lot has been revealed about Sterling’s business practices:
    • 2006: U.S. Dept. of Justice sued Sterling for housing discrimination. Allegedly, he said, “Black tenants smell and attract vermin.”
    • 2009: He reportedly paid $2.73 million in a Justice Dept. suit alleging he discriminated against blacks, Hispanics, and families with children in his rentals. (He also had to pay an additional nearly $5 million in attorneys fees and costs due to his counsel’s “sometimes outrageous conduct.”)
    • 2009: Clippers executive (and one of the greatest NBA players in history) sued for employment discrimination based on age and race.


    And now the poor guy’s girlfriend (undoubtedly ex-girlfriend now) is on tape cajoling him into revealing his racism. Man, what a winding road she led him down to get all of that out. She was like a sexy nanny playing “pin the fried chicken on the Sambo.” She blindfolded him and spun him around until he was just blathering all sorts of incoherent racist sound bites that had the news media peeing themselves with glee.

    [....]

    So, if we’re all going to be outraged, let’s be outraged that we weren’t more outraged when his racism was first evident. Let’s be outraged that private conversations between people in an intimate relationship are recorded and publicly played. Let’s be outraged that whoever did the betraying will probably get a book deal, a sitcom, trade recipes with Hoda and Kathie Lee, and soon appear on Celebrity Apprentice and Dancing with the Stars.
    He's very much right about everything in the article. He brings up an important point that has been largely ignored in this whole imbroglio: the girlfriend broke the law by taping that conversation. California is an all-party state, meaning that you can't tape conversations without someone's knowledge (there are certain exceptions, but getting salacious dirt on your soon-to-be-ex-sugar daddy so that you can sell it to TMZ isn't one of them) if they have a reasonable expectation that the conversation is private at the time. If someone is giving a campaign speech on a stump in the public square or a sermon to a church congregation, then there is no expectation of privacy and that is fair game. If, however, scott, Ginger, and I are in Celeste's apartment and having a conversation, we each have a reasonable expectation of privacy. We each have to be informed that the conversation is being recorded (I'm a little fuzzy on whether notification is sufficient or if we have to actually agree to be taped, but that doesn't really matter here), or else recording that conversation isn't legal, whether it's Ginger recording us, or if it's an outside party (HRH, for example, not a party to the conversation, but she sets up a recording device to record our conversation). Lost in all of the outrage here is the fact that this woman has apparently broken the law, and she needs to be investigated and prosecuted accordingly.

    You can't, of course, un-ring the bell. That she broke the law doesn't somehow make Sterling's comments somehow less reprehensible. But, as Bryant Gumball (sp?) pointed out on Sunday, the only real surprise here is that anyone is surprised at all. I'd never even heard of Sterling before Saturday, but then I could not care less about the NBA. Just not my thing. But the people around him, the players, the coaches, the NBA "brass," and indeed pretty much anyone in Southern California, have known about Sterling's apparently harbored prejudices for some time now. This should have taken no one by surprise. That people are expressing outrage now seems quite a bit too little, too late, and it rings awfully hollow now against a backdrop of a decade or more of apparently unfair treatment of Black people.

    I don't have any particular stake in the outcome of this one way or the other, either from a principled stance or just an emotional "I don't like that" stance. Some people harbor some particularly nasty thoughts. Some people are dumb enough to express those thoughts, either in public or in private. Frankly, I don't find what Sterling said any worse than great flurry of twitter, facebook, and Leftist blog activity yesterday, even while storms were happening and people were dying, celebrating, cheering, and jeering that people in "red states" were suffering and dying because they "deserved it" for not buying into the Global Warming Alarmist Cult. It's derisive, divisive, very hurtful, and yes, I've been guilty of it myself, though I certainly try to refrain. I don't know whether Sterling should actually lose his ownership of the Clippers. My immediate thought is that since he owns the franchise, no one has a specific right to take it away from him. But, the other side of that coin is that apparently there are some contractual obligations attached to that ownership to continue in the NBA. I'll leave that one up to the lawyers. But one way or the other, Kareem is right: those bristling the most with outrage right now really are at least somewhat morally bankrupt for not having that same outrage for the preceding decade or so.
    It's been ten years since that lonely day I left you
    In the morning rain, smoking gun in hand
    Ten lonely years but how my heart, it still remembers
    Pray for me, momma, I'm a gypsy now

  • #2
    The horrible thing about the Two Minutes Hate was not that one was obliged to act a part, but that it was impossible to avoid joining in. Within thirty seconds any pretence was always unnecessary. A hideous ecstasy of fear and vindictiveness, a desire to kill, to torture, to smash faces in with a sledge hammer, seemed to flow through the whole group of people like an electric current, turning one even against one's will into a grimacing, screaming lunatic. And yet the rage that one felt was an abstract, undirected emotion which could be switched from one object to another like the flame of a blowlamp.


    ~ From 1984 by George Orwell
    Colonel Vogel : What does the diary tell you that it doesn't tell us?

    Professor Henry Jones : It tells me, that goose-stepping morons like yourself should try *reading* books instead of *burning* them!

    Comment


    • #3
      Whenever these "See how they are." reactions "spontaneously" take over the public consciousness, context is the first thing to fly out the window. Now I know that some have immediately thought, "Here he goes with his devil's advocate routine." Substitute "contrarian" if you like. However, the context i am referring to is not some plausible or remotely mitigating context for the racist remarks or thoughts, no, the context I am referring to is that of the attitudes of those doing the finger wagging.

      Jabar says he has a list. A list? You mean a grudge list? An enemy list? A tickler file of who to watch out for? And that would differ from every other black person ( and every person for that matter) in which way?

      I have a list in my head too. I'm not much of an injustice collector, and I don't see the people on this list has personally attacking me so much as it's my list of stupid people.

      Black people in DC who demanded an aid get fired for saying "niggardly" who even when told what the word means and its origin, doubled down with the tried but true, "Well it sounded racist, so in my mind my feeling are what matters." or some similar bullshit. Anything but, "Sorry, I was wrong."

      The recent case where the politician referred to the "tar baby" and ignorant people who haven't even read the book, not only declared it was racist, but insisted that they didn't need to know about the character or the book to know that it was racist. Tar is black, and so the tar baby is racist. Stupid.

      Spike Lee complaining about white people moving back into Brooklyn. This walks hand in hand with black people in DC complaining about white people moving back into formerly white neighborhoods.

      Any criticism of Obama is racist. Seriously, this is getting tiresome. How is it that Maddow and O'Donnell continue this? Because it's working. Michael Medved pointed out yesterday that the Democratic strategy for the mid term is to convince black people that Republicans are racist, and that if they don't get out and vote for Democrats then healthcare, welfare, education, and voting rights will be done in.
      The year's at the spring
      And day's at the morn;
      Morning's at seven;
      The hill-side's dew-pearled;
      The lark's on the wing;
      The snail's on the thorn:
      God's in his heaven—
      All's right with the world!

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Novaheart View Post
        Whenever these "See how they are." reactions "spontaneously" take over the public consciousness, context is the first thing to fly out the window. Now I know that some have immediately thought, "Here he goes with his devil's advocate routine." Substitute "contrarian" if you like. However, the context i am referring to is not some plausible or remotely mitigating context for the racist remarks or thoughts, no, the context I am referring to is that of the attitudes of those doing the finger wagging.

        Jabar says he has a list. A list? You mean a grudge list? An enemy list? A tickler file of who to watch out for? And that would differ from every other black person ( and every person for that matter) in which way?

        I have a list in my head too. I'm not much of an injustice collector, and I don't see the people on this list has personally attacking me so much as it's my list of stupid people.

        Black people in DC who demanded an aid get fired for saying "niggardly" who even when told what the word means and its origin, doubled down with the tried but true, "Well it sounded racist, so in my mind my feeling are what matters." or some similar bullshit. Anything but, "Sorry, I was wrong."

        The recent case where the politician referred to the "tar baby" and ignorant people who haven't even read the book, not only declared it was racist, but insisted that they didn't need to know about the character or the book to know that it was racist. Tar is black, and so the tar baby is racist. Stupid.

        Spike Lee complaining about white people moving back into Brooklyn. This walks hand in hand with black people in DC complaining about white people moving back into formerly white neighborhoods.

        Any criticism of Obama is racist. Seriously, this is getting tiresome. How is it that Maddow and O'Donnell continue this? Because it's working. Michael Medved pointed out yesterday that the Democratic strategy for the mid term is to convince black people that Republicans are racist, and that if they don't get out and vote for Democrats then healthcare, welfare, education, and voting rights will be done in.
        That was a truly classic thread at NU. The spittle-flinging outrage was truly an amazing thing to behold.

        There is apparently a considerably longer version of this conversation out there, supposedly some nine minutes' worth. I've not heard it, but at least according to the description of it that I heard on the radio this morning, accompanied by Kareem's characterization of it in the article, Sterling was "badgered into" saying the ultimately offensive part, about not bringing Black players to the games. That doesn't undo what he said, but it would certainly seem, the more and more I'm hearing about this, that this girlfriend is a real shrew. Maybe she's just one of those people who like to watch the world burn. Who knows. But there's definitely no winners here, only losers.
        It's been ten years since that lonely day I left you
        In the morning rain, smoking gun in hand
        Ten lonely years but how my heart, it still remembers
        Pray for me, momma, I'm a gypsy now

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Adam View Post
          That was a truly classic thread at NU. The spittle-flinging outrage was truly an amazing thing to behold.

          There is apparently a considerably longer version of this conversation out there, supposedly some nine minutes' worth. I've not heard it, but at least according to the description of it that I heard on the radio this morning, accompanied by Kareem's characterization of it in the article, Sterling was "badgered into" saying the ultimately offensive part, about not bringing Black players to the games. That doesn't undo what he said, but it would certainly seem, the more and more I'm hearing about this, that this girlfriend is a real shrew. Maybe she's just one of those people who like to watch the world burn. Who knows. But there's definitely no winners here, only losers.
          Again, the missing context is how the black players feel if a wife, girlfriend, or concubine is seen in the company of men who might be more than hairdressers and style consultants. If (pick some black player)'s white girlfriend is photographed with some plausible white guy, is the black guy not going to have a discussion with her? If it's a case of him looking used in public, is he going to simply pat little Heidi on the head for embarrassing him?

          And for the record this isn't limited to straight people. Gay men of means don't like it when their boy toy makes them look like a pathetic old troll who only keeps a boy around with money. Ask Calvin Klein or to a lesser degree Anderson Cooper.
          The year's at the spring
          And day's at the morn;
          Morning's at seven;
          The hill-side's dew-pearled;
          The lark's on the wing;
          The snail's on the thorn:
          God's in his heaven—
          All's right with the world!

          Comment


          • #6
            With more credibility and style, KAJ is saying the same thing that Sharpton said on MSNBC..that people have known for years what Stirling is like and what he's done. Unlike KAJ though, Sharpton and Stirling were two of several recipients who were to be honored with a Lifetime Achievement Award from the LA chapter of the NAACP. Stirling's has now been rescinded.

            Now, why would the NAACP not know about Stirling's background? This is a "lifetime" achievement award..they should thoroughly have scrutinized it. And, if Sharpton knew all of this in advance as he said he did, why didn't he raise his normal over-the-top outrage?
            May we raise children who love the unloved things - the dandelion, the worm, the spiderlings.
            Children who sense the rose needs the thorn and run into rainswept days the same way they turn towards the sun...
            And when they're grown and someone has to speak for those who have no voice,
            may they draw upon that wilder bond, those days of tending tender things and be the one.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Michele View Post
              With more credibility and style, KAJ is saying the same thing that Sharpton said on MSNBC..that people have known for years what Stirling is like and what he's done. Unlike KAJ though, Sharpton and Stirling were two of several recipients who were to be honored with a Lifetime Achievement Award from the LA chapter of the NAACP. Stirling's has now been rescinded.

              Now, why would the NAACP not know about Stirling's background? This is a "lifetime" achievement award..they should thoroughly have scrutinized it. And, if Sharpton knew all of this in advance as he said he did, why didn't he raise his normal over-the-top outrage?
              Follow the money...
              We are so fucked.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Michele View Post
                With more credibility and style, KAJ is saying the same thing that Sharpton said on MSNBC..that people have known for years what Stirling is like and what he's done. Unlike KAJ though, Sharpton and Stirling were two of several recipients who were to be honored with a Lifetime Achievement Award from the LA chapter of the NAACP. Stirling's has now been rescinded.

                Now, why would the NAACP not know about Stirling's background? This is a "lifetime" achievement award..they should thoroughly have scrutinized it. And, if Sharpton knew all of this in advance as he said he did, why didn't he raise his normal over-the-top outrage?
                Tawana Brawley is changing his tune, then. On Sunday, on MTP, he was just filled with shock and outrage and declared that his band of merry thugs demanded that the NBA act before the end of the day on Sunday or else they would be ... somewhere ... picketing the NBA. He said exactly diddly about how he knew about this for years and everyone should have already been upset by this.

                Everyone act surprised: Captain Crown Heights is making shit up as he goes along.
                It's been ten years since that lonely day I left you
                In the morning rain, smoking gun in hand
                Ten lonely years but how my heart, it still remembers
                Pray for me, momma, I'm a gypsy now

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Adam View Post
                  That was a truly classic thread at NU. The spittle-flinging outrage was truly an amazing thing to behold.

                  There is apparently a considerably longer version of this conversation out there, supposedly some nine minutes' worth. I've not heard it, but at least according to the description of it that I heard on the radio this morning, accompanied by Kareem's characterization of it in the article, Sterling was "badgered into" saying the ultimately offensive part, about not bringing Black players to the games. That doesn't undo what he said, but it would certainly seem, the more and more I'm hearing about this, that this girlfriend is a real shrew. Maybe she's just one of those people who like to watch the world burn. Who knows. But there's definitely no winners here, only losers.
                  I've heard some of the tape. He was absolutely set up. She did everything but headstands to get him to say something ignorant. Granted, she clearly knew that he was capable of ignorant speech, but this was clearly a gotcha exercise for her. It wasn't Mel Gibson going off on a tawdry rant that gets picked up. It was planned and executed.
                  Not where I breathe, but where I love, I live...
                  Robert Southwell, S.J.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by gary m View Post
                    Follow the money...
                    I was thinking shake down, too.

                    Originally posted by Adam View Post
                    Tawana Brawley is changing his tune, then. On Sunday, on MTP, he was just filled with shock and outrage and declared that his band of merry thugs demanded that the NBA act before the end of the day on Sunday or else they would be ... somewhere ... picketing the NBA. He said exactly diddly about how he knew about this for years and everyone should have already been upset by this.

                    Everyone act surprised: Captain Crown Heights is making shit up as he goes along.
                    To be more clear, I meant that Sharpton also said that he knew about Stirling's past issues. If that's true, why would he be a fellow recipient with him?

                    As an aside, MTP couldn't find someone beside Sharpton to have on that could speak to the controversy?
                    May we raise children who love the unloved things - the dandelion, the worm, the spiderlings.
                    Children who sense the rose needs the thorn and run into rainswept days the same way they turn towards the sun...
                    And when they're grown and someone has to speak for those who have no voice,
                    may they draw upon that wilder bond, those days of tending tender things and be the one.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Sterling has been banned from the NBA for life and fined $2.5M.

                      The NBA's bylaws allow for owners to be expelled from the league, though that power is reserved for limited circumstances, such as the inability to operate financially, gambling on league games or fixing games.

                      The more likely route, which Silver took, lay within Article 35 of the NBA Constitution, which allows the commissioner to indefinitely suspend owners for "conduct prejudicial or detrimental to the association."
                      I'm a bit curious about this. If they're going to shut him out and effectively force him to sell the team (albeit in a round-about way), then is the fine really enforceable? Under what authority can the league fine him if he's going to not be an owner?

                      The NBA may have over-reached here.
                      It's been ten years since that lonely day I left you
                      In the morning rain, smoking gun in hand
                      Ten lonely years but how my heart, it still remembers
                      Pray for me, momma, I'm a gypsy now

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        "conduct prejudicial or detrimental to the association."


                        I think that case could be made.
                        Colonel Vogel : What does the diary tell you that it doesn't tell us?

                        Professor Henry Jones : It tells me, that goose-stepping morons like yourself should try *reading* books instead of *burning* them!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          "But regardless of your background, regardless of the history they have, if we're taking something somebody said in their home and we're trying to turn it into something that leads to you being forced to divest property in any way, shape or form, that's not the United States of America. I don't want to be part of that."

                          Mark Cuban
                          Owner, Dallas Mavericks


                          I just actually tried to watch Harry Reid's son Rory the attorney try and justify this action by the NBA on a Las Vegas news program entitled "What's Your Point." He almost makes his father look smart.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Well, this is certainly going to be embarrassing for a while:







                            Then again, the National Association for the Advancement of Political Correctness stopped having any shame whatsoever decades ago.
                            It's been ten years since that lonely day I left you
                            In the morning rain, smoking gun in hand
                            Ten lonely years but how my heart, it still remembers
                            Pray for me, momma, I'm a gypsy now

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              NAACP Willing to 'Forgive' Clippers' Donald Sterling After Yanking Award

                              "God teaches us to forgive, and the way I look at it, after a sustained period of proof to the African American community that those words don't reflect his heart, I think there's room for forgiveness. I wouldn't be a Christian if I said there wasn't," Jenkins said.

                              "We are negotiating with him about giving more moneys to African American students at UCLA, and so we are in preliminary discussions," Jenkins said. He also noted, however, they had not spoken since the scandal broke.

                              Video and Link

                              They'll take back their award but they won't give back the money he's given/going to give.
                              May we raise children who love the unloved things - the dandelion, the worm, the spiderlings.
                              Children who sense the rose needs the thorn and run into rainswept days the same way they turn towards the sun...
                              And when they're grown and someone has to speak for those who have no voice,
                              may they draw upon that wilder bond, those days of tending tender things and be the one.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X