Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wow. What an asshole.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Wow. What an asshole.




    I’m not yet sure whether Foursquare chief executive Dennis Crowley has set a new standard for arrogance or for stupidity— or perhaps it’s both. What I do know is that if I were one of the brand-name venture capital firms backing his New York-based social media company, I would be second-guessing the soundness of my investment right now. After pictures surfaced online, Crowley has admitted that he helped his wife Chelsa run the Boston Marathon with him this past week with a fake bib. As a lifelong resident of Boston, who has run the Marathon before and was in the stands at the finish line last year, I find the actions of Crowley and his wife deplorable.

    According to Crowley, he ran the Marathon with his wife last year but got separated toward the end of the race, and they were unable to finish together. He stated that they felt they “needed to run again and finish together to get closure.” Crowley had received a number for this year’s race, but he couldn’t get one for his wife. Undeterred, they just created a fake bib with a number that ensured that Chelsea would be in the same corral as her husband. An emissary of Boston Strong indeed.

    Let’s pause for a second and put this in perspective. The CEO of a company with more than 45 million members worldwide, $162 million in venture funding, and on the path to an IPO that will likely make the 37-year-old entrepreneur a billionaire, decides that his story from last year’s tragic Marathon is special and entitles him to circumvent the processes that are in place to ensure fairness and safety for everyone participating in this event. Again, not sure if this is arrogance, stupidity, or a good measure of both.

    In case you were wondering, Crowley and his wife were not among the hundreds physically injured or maimed in the Marathon bombings. However, even to raise that point would somehow suggest that being a victim of last year’s bombings would justify cheating in order to participate in this year’s race. Such logic is insulting to all of last year’s victims and the absolute antitheses of what Boston Strong is about.

    Kathy Brown is the runner whose bib number was duplicated by Crowley and his wife. She is one of the thousands of Marathon participants who earn bib numbers each year by raising money for charities. Brown’s uncle passed away from multiple sclerosis, and she attained her bib number by raising funds to help others fight the horrible disease. Her kind of selflessness, however, is lost on Crowley and his wife. As he explained in his statement this week, “I don’t expect everyone to understand our strong need to run and finish together. . . . We did what we could to make sure we could run together in the hopes of finishing together.” No, we understand perfectly. You cheated together.
    "Chelsea Crowley checked in at Boston Marathon, right on top of Kathy Brown...."
    It's been ten years since that lonely day I left you
    In the morning rain, smoking gun in hand
    Ten lonely years but how my heart, it still remembers
    Pray for me, momma, I'm a gypsy now

  • #2
    Dennis Crowley does sound like a self centered asshole.

    Comment


    • #3
      Stupid and arrogant.
      Not where I breathe, but where I love, I live...
      Robert Southwell, S.J.

      Comment


      • #4
        That's why we call them "Massholes."
        "Faith is nothing but a firm assent of the mind : which, if it be regulated, as is our duty, cannot be afforded to anything but upon good reason, and so cannot be opposite to it."
        -John Locke

        "It's all been melded together into one giant, authoritarian, leftist scream."
        -Newman

        Comment


        • #5
          Where's the moral shame here? Why would he admit to such an awful thing and then go on to justify it?

          I guess in the world of 'situational ethics' his wife's need to pretend she did something she didn't do, trumps the fact that some other woman did do those things.

          I wish I could say this was unbelievable.
          "Alexa, slaughter the fatted calf."

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Gingersnap View Post
            Where's the moral shame here? Why would he admit to such an awful thing and then go on to justify it?

            I guess in the world of 'situational ethics' his wife's need to pretend she did something she didn't do, trumps the fact that some other woman did do those things.

            I wish I could say this was unbelievable.
            I don't think his wife pretended to do anything. She ran the marathon. She ran it with a fake bib. She didn't claim to do anything else, as far as I know.

            She wanted to run the marathon, couldn't get in, so she snuck in. Due to his position they shouldn't have done that. They cheated and broke a rule, but that's really all they did. I'm not excusing it (I know that marathoners are crazy about that whole qualification thing) but it's not like they claimed she raised money for charity or anything like that. They had a "need" to finish the run together at the exact same time. Stupid. narcissistic. Vapid. But that's really all that happened.
            Not where I breathe, but where I love, I live...
            Robert Southwell, S.J.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by phillygirl View Post
              I don't think his wife pretended to do anything. She ran the marathon. She ran it with a fake bib. She didn't claim to do anything else, as far as I know.

              She wanted to run the marathon, couldn't get in, so she snuck in. Due to his position they shouldn't have done that. They cheated and broke a rule, but that's really all they did. I'm not excusing it (I know that marathoners are crazy about that whole qualification thing) but it's not like they claimed she raised money for charity or anything like that. They had a "need" to finish the run together at the exact same time. Stupid. narcissistic. Vapid. But that's really all that happened.
              She did, though. By wearing the number of a legitimate competitor she faked her identity in that race. To the people watching the race and the organizers, she did "claim" to have done something she didn't do. That isn't like sneaking into a movie without paying (or "stealing" as my Mother would have called it).

              That woman could run a marathon anywhere. The definition is just a distance. She could walk out of her own home and run a marathon tonight if she had some lighting.

              He's a narcissistic idiot but she's a moral moron. If she let's him convince her do this then she's just as bad.
              "Alexa, slaughter the fatted calf."

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Gingersnap View Post
                She did, though. By wearing the number of a legitimate competitor she faked her identity in that race. To the people watching the race and the organizers, she did "claim" to have done something she didn't do. That isn't like sneaking into a movie without paying (or "stealing" as my Mother would have called it).
                She wore a number. She snuck into a movie. She stole. I agree with all that. She's morally impure because she stole, but she didn't try to take on the whole persona of the person...just wanted to sneak into a marathon.

                That woman could run a marathon anywhere. The definition is just a distance. She could walk out of her own home and run a marathon tonight if she had some lighting.

                He's a narcissistic idiot but she's a moral moron. If she let's him convince her do this then she's just as bad.
                Oh, I agree, except that they're both morons. And their moral issues are the same. I get that it's a huge deal to get a number for the marathon. It's ridiculous that they already ran it together once, just didn't finish together. Yes, last year was a tragedy. Yes, some people really had a "need" to run it again this year. Some of those people are now missing limbs. These people are just assholes.
                Not where I breathe, but where I love, I live...
                Robert Southwell, S.J.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Is it really surprising that so few ask themselves the question, "Am I doing something rude?"
                  Colonel Vogel : What does the diary tell you that it doesn't tell us?

                  Professor Henry Jones : It tells me, that goose-stepping morons like yourself should try *reading* books instead of *burning* them!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Billy Jingo View Post
                    Is it really surprising that so few ask themselves the question, "Am I doing something rude?"
                    A more relevant question would be, "Am I doing something wrong?.
                    "Alexa, slaughter the fatted calf."

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      She didn't actually displace another runner, right? Like, you'd be hard put to point to a single person that was hurt by her actions. If there are any damages, they are the more gauzy "maintaining the tradition" sort, right?
                      Enjoy.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Gingersnap View Post
                        A more relevant question would be, "Am I doing something wrong?.
                        I disagree. That question is too easily answered in the negative.
                        Colonel Vogel : What does the diary tell you that it doesn't tell us?

                        Professor Henry Jones : It tells me, that goose-stepping morons like yourself should try *reading* books instead of *burning* them!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Norm dePlume View Post
                          She didn't actually displace another runner, right? Like, you'd be hard put to point to a single person that was hurt by her actions. If there are any damages, they are the more gauzy "maintaining the tradition" sort, right?
                          You don't participate in any amateur sports, do you?

                          If I pretend your amateur writing effort is mine in order to enter another amateur event, it's okay, right? I mean, your amateur effort isn't "real" or anything. No one is hurt. You can't claim any damages since you weren't being paid for anything. It was just your minor rep in your tiny fundraising community. It's not like I even care about your writing/charity thingy - I was just using your fundraising deal for a minute. And hey! - I'll throw some Benjamins toward your little charity thingy. It's probably way more than you could raise through your own minor training/begging/blogging/activism thingy.

                          So, we're good, right?
                          "Alexa, slaughter the fatted calf."

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Gingersnap View Post
                            You don't participate in any amateur sports, do you?

                            If I pretend your amateur writing effort is mine in order to enter another amateur event, it's okay, right? I mean, your amateur effort isn't "real" or anything. No one is hurt. You can't claim any damages since you weren't being paid for anything. It was just your minor rep in your tiny fundraising community. It's not like I even care about your writing/charity thingy - I was just using your fundraising deal for a minute. And hey! - I'll throw some Benjamins toward your little charity thingy. It's probably way more than you could raise through your own minor training/begging/blogging/activism thingy.

                            So, we're good, right?
                            That's not really analogous. She didn't steal anyone's work. And, as I understand it, the person whose number she replicated (Kathy Brown) did actually take part in the marathon herself, and so Kathy Brown's effort got exactly the same reward that it would have gotten if Chelsea Crowley had stayed home.

                            I'm not saying Chelsea didn't do wrong. She was wrong, and she should probably be banned from future marathon events. I'm just saying Kathy Brown was not hurt by this.
                            Enjoy.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Norm dePlume View Post
                              That's not really analogous. She didn't steal anyone's work. And, as I understand it, the person whose number she replicated (Kathy Brown) did actually take part in the marathon herself, and so Kathy Brown's effort got exactly the same reward that it would have gotten if Chelsea Crowley had stayed home.

                              I'm not saying Chelsea didn't do wrong. She was wrong, and she should probably be banned from future marathon events. I'm just saying Kathy Brown was not hurt by this.
                              It is "work". If someone uses your "work" as her "work" but you still get to submit, exhibit, or perform under your own name - how is that not stealing? How is it not impacting your own reputation? In this case, it's actually worse since her time would be falsely reported until it was untangled if it ever was.

                              I get that people who don't do this stuff somehow believe that their own charity/amateur efforts are way more important since they are "creative" and that trumps most things but it doesn't. If it's wrong to steal someone's art even if it doesn't matter, it's wrong to steal someone's place and time, even if it doesn't matter to you.
                              "Alexa, slaughter the fatted calf."

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X