If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
"Since the historic ruling, the Lovings have become icons for equality. Mildred released a statement on the 40th anniversary of the ruling in 2007: 'I am proud that Richard’s and my name is on a court case that can help reinforce the love, the commitment, the fairness, and the family that so many people, Black or white, young or old, gay or straight, seek in life. I support the freedom to marry for all. That’s what Loving, and loving, are all about.'." - Mildred Loving (Loving v. Virginia)
That first one looks like a cross between an illustration of an Ayn Rand novel and those Tom of Finland paintings.
"Since the historic ruling, the Lovings have become icons for equality. Mildred released a statement on the 40th anniversary of the ruling in 2007: 'I am proud that Richard’s and my name is on a court case that can help reinforce the love, the commitment, the fairness, and the family that so many people, Black or white, young or old, gay or straight, seek in life. I support the freedom to marry for all. That’s what Loving, and loving, are all about.'." - Mildred Loving (Loving v. Virginia)
Probably because the artist who did the cover for a few of her reissues uses the same soft cubist Art Deco style of Tamara de Lempicka.
I think he did the Ayn Rand postage stamp, too.
Her stuff is very close to iconic. I recognize it immediately or at least works that are derivative.
Whatever. I didn't mean it as a compliment. There's very little Cubism that appeals to me, and that particular brand of soullessness, not at all. And I don't really care if it's a statement. It's ugly.
"Since the historic ruling, the Lovings have become icons for equality. Mildred released a statement on the 40th anniversary of the ruling in 2007: 'I am proud that Richard’s and my name is on a court case that can help reinforce the love, the commitment, the fairness, and the family that so many people, Black or white, young or old, gay or straight, seek in life. I support the freedom to marry for all. That’s what Loving, and loving, are all about.'." - Mildred Loving (Loving v. Virginia)
Whatever. I didn't mean it as a compliment. There's very little Cubism that appeals to me, and that particular brand of soullessness, not at all. And I don't really care if it's a statement. It's ugly.
Yea. I understand. I never really got Rothko.
“Thus it is that no cruelty whatsoever passes by without impact. Thus it is that we always pay dearly for chasing after what is cheap.”
Boring, but inoffensively so (unless one happens to have paid a great deal of money for one, but that's self-inflicted). The hyper-stylized pictures feel like fascist poster propaganda instead of art. JMO, needless to say.
"Since the historic ruling, the Lovings have become icons for equality. Mildred released a statement on the 40th anniversary of the ruling in 2007: 'I am proud that Richard’s and my name is on a court case that can help reinforce the love, the commitment, the fairness, and the family that so many people, Black or white, young or old, gay or straight, seek in life. I support the freedom to marry for all. That’s what Loving, and loving, are all about.'." - Mildred Loving (Loving v. Virginia)
Comment