No announcement yet.

MILLER: D.C. man on trial for one shotgun shell - wasn’t given David Gregory deal

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MILLER: D.C. man on trial for one shotgun shell - wasn’t given David Gregory deal

    MILLER: D.C. man on trial for one shotgun shell - wasn’t given David Gregory deal

    Mark Witaschek is first known prosecution for inoperable, unregistered ammunition

    By Emily Miller-The Washington Times Monday, January 20, 2014

    MILLER: D.C. businessman faces two years in jail for unregistered ammunition, brass casing

    A year ago this month, the attorney general for the District of Columbia let NBC News anchor David Gregory off scot-free for possession of a “high capacity” magazine because doing so “would not promote public safety.”

    Now, Irvin Nathan refuses to use that same prosecutorial discretion for an average citizen who violated a bizarre technicality that makes empty casings and shells a crime as serious as having an illegal firearm.

    Mr. Witaschek, a successful financial adviser with no criminal history, is the first known case of a citizen being prosecuted in D.C. for inoperable ammunition. Washington police and prosecutors have spent a year and a half trying to nail him for the possession of so-called unregistered ammunition.

    A hunter and gun owner, Mr. Witaschek has always kept his firearms at his sister’s house in Virginia. If convicted, he faces a year in jail and a $1,000 fine for having a single, inoperable shotgun shell in his home. The jury trial starts on Feb. 11.

    The Metropolitan Police Department raided Mr. Witaschek’s rented Georgetown house twice in the summer of 2012 on the word of his angry ex-wife.

    Frustrated with not finding the promised firearms, the police handcuffed him, searched his home top to bottom and came out with only ammunition, which carries the same felony penalty as a firearm.

    (Click here for more details of the raids from my first story on his case.)

    Mr. Witaschek told me this week, “Since the night my home was invaded and family terrorized by a militarized D.C. police force, I am more afraid of what government is doing than I am of any of the people I encountered when I spent the night in jail.”

    He added, “The Second Amendment was meant to guarantee individuals the right to protect themselves against government — as much as against private bad guys and gangs.”

    There have been two pre-trail hearings in the case so far. At the end of the first hearing in November, Judge Robert Morin gave the government until Jan. 3 to come up with a good defense for the initial police raid without a search warrant.

    Knowing things weren’t going in their favor, the two assistant attorneys general for the District on the case, Peter Saba and Oritsejemine Trouth, offered Mr. Witaschek probation if he pleaded guilty. He declined the offer.

    At the second hearing, the judge disallowed the first warrantless search and the fruits of it. This eliminated a box of rifle ammunition from the charges.

    Undeterred, the prosecutors continued with the two items from the second raid — a misfired 12-gauge shotgun shell and a box of muzzleloader sabots.

    Sabots are plastic covers that make it easier to push the bullet into a muzzleloader gun. There is no propellent on the bullet or sabot — because the gunpowder is separated — so it is not clear that it can be categorized as ammunition and thus only registered gun owners can possess it.

    Thus, the single vaguely legitimate remaining charge for “unregistered ammunition” is the misfired shotgun shell that Mr. Witaschek has kept as a souvenir from deer hunting years earlier. The shell cannot be fired because the primer was already stricken and failed to propel it.

    Read more:
    Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
    "Alexa, slaughter the fatted calf."

  • #2
    Originally posted by Gingersnap View Post

    Read more:
    Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
    The weather is lovely in Ecuador this time of year.
    If it pays, it stays


    • #3
      The government is always reasonable with laws on the books right?

      Oh I know, "change the laws if you don't like them."

      But then when people want the laws changed or resist more restrictive laws like more background checks the Boks of the world say "extreme" and "fetish."
      "Faith is nothing but a firm assent of the mind : which, if it be regulated, as is our duty, cannot be afforded to anything but upon good reason, and so cannot be opposite to it."
      -John Locke

      "It's all been melded together into one giant, authoritarian, leftist scream."


      • #4
        I believe this us a prime example if someone with a gun fetish.
        Not where I breathe, but where I love, I live...
        Robert Southwell, S.J.