Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Gentrification May Actually Be Boon To Longtime Residents

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Gentrification May Actually Be Boon To Longtime Residents

    Gentrification May Actually Be Boon To Longtime Residents
    by LAURA SULLIVAN
    January 22, 2014 3:44 AM

    The bustling Sidamo coffee shop in Washington's H Street Northeast neighborhood. The area has attracted many new, young residents and high-end bars, retail and restaurants over the past several years.

    Bobby Foster Jr. can often be found reading the paper on a wooden bench outside Murry's grocery store on the corner of Sixth and H streets northeast in Washington, D.C.

    "The sun shines over here this time of day," says Foster, a retired cook. "It's always good when the sun shines."

    Murry's has been an anchor in this neighborhood for decades — during the crack wars of the 1980s and the urban blight that followed, when most other businesses packed up and left. Foster has been somewhat of an anchor, too. He's lived here for 54 years.

    But now, this neighborhood and hundreds like it across the country are changing. Every other shop is a new restaurant, high-end salon or bar.

    A 1988 riot in Tompkins Square Park in New York's East Village helped bring the concept of gentrification to the fore in the U.S.i

    That's been a dirty word for 30 years, since the middle and upper classes began returning to many urban cores across the U.S. It brings up images of neighbors forced out of their homes.

    But a series of new studies are now showing that gentrifying neighborhoods may be a boon to longtime residents as well — and that those residents may not be moving out after all.

    Even Foster is conflicted by the change he sees happening around him.

    "Some things are good; some things are bad," he says. "But sometimes the good outweighs the bad."

    Gentrification burst into the social consciousness on Aug. 6, 1988, with the Tompkins Square Park riot in New York City's East Village. Residents carried signs saying "Gentrification is class war." Police carried batons. The bloody battle that ensued left more than 100 people injured.

    The protesters' fury centered on the idea that the poor would be made homeless so the rich could live in their neighborhoods, destroying whatever character they may have had.

    A lifetime resident of the H Street Northeast area, Cherry Tilghman says some of the changes here, like a new Giant grocery store, have improved the neighborhood.

    Lance Freeman, the director of the Urban Planning program at Columbia University, says that's what he believed was happening, too. He launched a study, first in Harlem and then nationally, calculating how many people were pushed out of their homes when wealthy people moved in.

    "My intuition would be that people were being displaced," Freeman explains, "so they're going to be moving more quickly. I was really aiming to quantify how much displacement was occurring."

    Except that's not what he found.
    I lived through gentrification. We were not part of it - we simply moved into a neighborhood we could afford and stayed there. This was when the area was full of vacant storefronts, ugly, disruptive rentals, drug dealing, and high crime. The only thing we contributed was buying local and not committing crimes.

    We didn't pop the top on our house, open a vegan soup kitchen, or start a community yoga center.

    We picked it because we don't believe in luck. The house was do-able (not our dream house, not our potential investment property). It had a mortgage payment either of us could make if one of us died or became unemployed. It was on a lot of bus lines in case our sorry cars gave up the ghost. You could walk to a non-name grocery store, liquor store, or a little farther - a public library.

    There was a lot of crime (property and personal), a dealer lived on our block with the attendant chaos, our yard got searched by police more than once. SWAT set up on my lawn.

    All the bad things happened: lost jobs, dead cars, evil relatives, poor familial loans, unexpected catastrophes, etc.

    The neighborhood picked up. Young white couple bought in, trendy stores opened, classy eateries appeared. Our no-name grocery closed and the natural grocery store that took it's place was out of our budget. The regular liquor store closed but you could get budget beer if you knew to ask (they kept it in the fridge, not displayed). The area become more interesting with street festivals and unusual stores. The crime dropped. The dealers left. The police stopped coming around. Housing prices went WAY up.

    We could have stayed but we sold at the top of the market and were glad to do it. It turned into a hyper-trendy, very artsy location which is great but not what we liked. So we moved. Just like a lot of people of all colors, cultures, and ages. Moving was not a defeat - it was a victory!

    NPR
    "Alexa, slaughter the fatted calf."

  • #2
    I always wondered why gentrification was so bad. I'm really hoping it happens in my Maryland town. I also really hope a Whole Foods moves in in the next big town near there.
    Not where I breathe, but where I love, I live...
    Robert Southwell, S.J.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by phillygirl View Post
      I always wondered why gentrification was so bad. I'm really hoping it happens in my Maryland town. I also really hope a Whole Foods moves in in the next big town near there.
      LOL! We're happy we got this big improvement/arts/upscale grant out here. Now that we can afford it, we're looking forward to a few pricey eateries and some community theater. We'll stay to support it!

      Gentrification was a big help in our financial planning. People who wring their hands over it are people who think their previous drug/crime/corner store existence is superior. It may be emotionally comfortable but it's not comparable to the vintage heyday of the area and it's not desirable long term.
      "Alexa, slaughter the fatted calf."

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by phillygirl View Post
        I always wondered why gentrification was so bad. I'm really hoping it happens in my Maryland town. I also really hope a Whole Foods moves in in the next big town near there.
        Gentrification is bad for local activists because new people move in and don't need them to "save the neighborhood." Detroit could use some gentrification but they can't get rid of the people that turned it into a shambles in the first place.
        "Faith is nothing but a firm assent of the mind : which, if it be regulated, as is our duty, cannot be afforded to anything but upon good reason, and so cannot be opposite to it."
        -John Locke

        "It's all been melded together into one giant, authoritarian, leftist scream."
        -Newman

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Gingersnap View Post
          LOL! We're happy we got this big improvement/arts/upscale grant out here. Now that we can afford it, we're looking forward to a few pricey eateries and some community theater. We'll stay to support it!

          Gentrification was a big help in our financial planning. People who wring their hands over it are people who think their previous drug/crime/corner store existence is superior. It may be emotionally comfortable but it's not comparable to the vintage heyday of the area and it's not desirable long term.
          Yeah, we frequently talk about that down there. On the one hand, the fact that the town is fairly undiscovered makes for the peace and quiet that I really enjoy. However, it would be nice to have the upscale shops and grocery stores that I have back home.

          For me, financially, I'm okay either way, as I did "luck out" in terms of my buying at the right time. For many of my neighbors, they've taken a bath in the market downturn. The town itself has a lot of potential and it's making progress. It just never fully recovered from the race riots, when a good portion of it was burned to the ground.
          Not where I breathe, but where I love, I live...
          Robert Southwell, S.J.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by phillygirl View Post
            Yeah, we frequently talk about that down there. On the one hand, the fact that the town is fairly undiscovered makes for the peace and quiet that I really enjoy. However, it would be nice to have the upscale shops and grocery stores that I have back home.

            For me, financially, I'm okay either way, as I did "luck out" in terms of my buying at the right time. For many of my neighbors, they've taken a bath in the market downturn. The town itself has a lot of potential and it's making progress. It just never fully recovered from the race riots, when a good portion of it was burned to the ground.
            If you like it, no problem. I liked where we lived. It wasn't my dream or anything but I rolled with the changes. If there hadn't been any changes, we wouldn't have made much huge money but we'd still have met our financial goals.

            I would have still had flowers, friends, parties, and so on.
            "Alexa, slaughter the fatted calf."

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Gingersnap View Post
              If you like it, no problem. I liked where we lived. It wasn't my dream or anything but I rolled with the changes. If there hadn't been any changes, we wouldn't have made much huge money but we'd still have met our financial goals.

              I would have still had flowers, friends, parties, and so on.
              As I said, I'm torn. I'm sure if the area does get "discovered", I'll tire of it, as my peace will then be disturbed. For now, no traffic, no crowds, no Whole Foods, and I'm okay with that.
              Not where I breathe, but where I love, I live...
              Robert Southwell, S.J.

              Comment


              • #8
                Notice how the article refers to the "rich people". I am not familiar with "gentrification" (or as I like to call it: moving back to your grandparents' neighborhood) in every city but the "rich people" I have known doing this in DC aren't rich. Rich people don't move into coming-soon or coming-back neighborhoods as a rule, they prefer the always was and still is neighborhood or at least the has-arrived.

                My grandparents lived on Capitol Hill in the 1940's. It wasn't rich people then, and the guys who brought it back in the 1970's weren't rich either. To this day, some of the peripheral areas of Capitol Hill (by a realtor's rubber definition) are the affordable fixer upper. Yes, many of the homes have been restored to a grandeur they never knew before. Some of them have been restored to a period predating their construction.

                And people have bitched. People who moved to DC in the 1950's. People who trashed those once safe neighborhoods. People who trashed the once proud DC public schools. The problem isn't the people moving in, it's the people who are the grandchildren of the people who moved in in the 1950's.
                The year's at the spring
                And day's at the morn;
                Morning's at seven;
                The hill-side's dew-pearled;
                The lark's on the wing;
                The snail's on the thorn:
                God's in his heaven—
                All's right with the world!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by phillygirl View Post
                  Yeah, we frequently talk about that down there. On the one hand, the fact that the town is fairly undiscovered makes for the peace and quiet that I really enjoy. However, it would be nice to have the upscale shops and grocery stores that I have back home.

                  For me, financially, I'm okay either way, as I did "luck out" in terms of my buying at the right time. For many of my neighbors, they've taken a bath in the market downturn. The town itself has a lot of potential and it's making progress. It just never fully recovered from the race riots, when a good portion of it was burned to the ground.
                  Hate to tell you this, but before the riots, it never recovered from the bypass. Every little burg along 50 used to put up a speed trap and try to divert people heading from DC to OC onto their backwater Main Street. People got sick of it and the State Roads bypassed "downtown" Cambridge and Easton...I don't know if they ever managed to go around Vienna. But my mom has always sworn that the Depression (the original one) hit the Eastern Shore first and never left.
                  "Since the historic ruling, the Lovings have become icons for equality. Mildred released a statement on the 40th anniversary of the ruling in 2007: 'I am proud that Richard’s and my name is on a court case that can help reinforce the love, the commitment, the fairness, and the family that so many people, Black or white, young or old, gay or straight, seek in life. I support the freedom to marry for all. That’s what Loving, and loving, are all about.'." - Mildred Loving (Loving v. Virginia)

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Celeste Chalfonte View Post
                    Hate to tell you this, but before the riots, it never recovered from the bypass. Every little burg along 50 used to put up a speed trap and try to divert people heading from DC to OC onto their backwater Main Street. People got sick of it and the State Roads bypassed "downtown" Cambridge and Easton...I don't know if they ever managed to go around Vienna. But my mom has always sworn that the Depression (the original one) hit the Eastern Shore first and never left.
                    Cambridge and Easton have some very pricey areas. There are people commuting from east of Salisbury to the DC area these days.
                    The year's at the spring
                    And day's at the morn;
                    Morning's at seven;
                    The hill-side's dew-pearled;
                    The lark's on the wing;
                    The snail's on the thorn:
                    God's in his heaven—
                    All's right with the world!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Novaheart View Post
                      Cambridge and Easton have some very pricey areas. There are people commuting from east of Salisbury to the DC area these days.
                      Yep. Easton particularly. Cambridge is still has quite a way to go.
                      Not where I breathe, but where I love, I live...
                      Robert Southwell, S.J.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Novaheart View Post
                        Notice how the article refers to the "rich people". I am not familiar with "gentrification" (or as I like to call it: moving back to your grandparents' neighborhood) in every city but the "rich people" I have known doing this in DC aren't rich. Rich people don't move into coming-soon or coming-back neighborhoods as a rule, they prefer the always was and still is neighborhood or at least the has-arrived.

                        My grandparents lived on Capitol Hill in the 1940's. It wasn't rich people then, and the guys who brought it back in the 1970's weren't rich either. To this day, some of the peripheral areas of Capitol Hill (by a realtor's rubber definition) are the affordable fixer upper. Yes, many of the homes have been restored to a grandeur they never knew before. Some of them have been restored to a period predating their construction.

                        And people have bitched. People who moved to DC in the 1950's. People who trashed those once safe neighborhoods. People who trashed the once proud DC public schools. The problem isn't the people moving in, it's the people who are the grandchildren of the people who moved in in the 1950's.
                        I thought it usually started with DINKS.
                        Colonel Vogel : What does the diary tell you that it doesn't tell us?

                        Professor Henry Jones : It tells me, that goose-stepping morons like yourself should try *reading* books instead of *burning* them!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Billy Jingo View Post
                          I thought it usually started with DINKS.
                          Well, those are the people with the time and inclination. I'd guess tearing out fake walls and rewiring an entire structure would difficult with children underfoot. A lot of single people also do this kind of thing but at a much slower pace.
                          "Alexa, slaughter the fatted calf."

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Novaheart View Post
                            Cambridge and Easton have some very pricey areas. There are people commuting from east of Salisbury to the DC area these days.
                            And I'm happy for them. But I wouldn't trade my 12-minute average commute for theirs if you GAVE me the house in Cambridge and the car to commute in.
                            "Since the historic ruling, the Lovings have become icons for equality. Mildred released a statement on the 40th anniversary of the ruling in 2007: 'I am proud that Richard’s and my name is on a court case that can help reinforce the love, the commitment, the fairness, and the family that so many people, Black or white, young or old, gay or straight, seek in life. I support the freedom to marry for all. That’s what Loving, and loving, are all about.'." - Mildred Loving (Loving v. Virginia)

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Celeste Chalfonte View Post
                              And I'm happy for them. But I wouldn't trade my 12-minute average commute for theirs if you GAVE me the house in Cambridge and the car to commute in.
                              If I were to have cause to live in Maryland (like massive inheritance required it) I would try living in Baltimore. It's somewhat like San Francisco if you look in the right directions.
                              The year's at the spring
                              And day's at the morn;
                              Morning's at seven;
                              The hill-side's dew-pearled;
                              The lark's on the wing;
                              The snail's on the thorn:
                              God's in his heaven—
                              All's right with the world!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X