Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why the U.S. Should Merge With Canada

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Why the U.S. Should Merge With Canada

    Why the U.S. Should Merge With Canada
    By DIANE FRANCIS April 10, 2014

    The United States and Canada are far more integrated than most people think. In fact, a merger between the two countries isn’t just desirable—it’s inevitable.

    We share more than just the world’s longest border. We share the same values, lifestyles and aspirations. Our societies and economies are becoming similar in significant ways.

    In 1966, I emigrated from the United States to Canada as a young woman. In the nearly 50 years since then, I’ve have seen Canada become more like America and America become more like Canada.

    Canada used to be controlled by a few families, banks and conglomerates. It’s now a more dynamic, multicultural country powered by free enterprise. At the same time, the United States has become more progressive on issues like civil rights, women’s rights, gay rights and, yes, universal health care. Canadians and Americans are so indistinguishable to the rest of the world that some Canadians put maple-leaf flags on their lapels or backpacks so as not to be mistaken for Americans. That’s easy enough to do, as we tend to marry, study, date, play, work, invest and travel alike.

    Put together, the United States and Canada would be a colossus, with an economy larger than the European Union’s—larger, in fact, than those of China, Taiwan, Japan and South Korea combined. We would control more oil, water, arable land and resources than any jurisdiction on Earth, all protected by the world’s most powerful military.

    Far-fetched? Maybe. But consider this: Two Canadian prime ministers – one after the First World War and another after the Second World War – seriously considered proposing a merger with the United States. They did not proceed for political reasons.

    In the 1970s, Canadian tycoon E.P. Taylor, famed for his thoroughbred race horses, told a biographer: “If it weren’t for the racial issue in the U.S. and the political problems [Vietnam] they have, I would think that the two countries could come together … I’m against the trend of trying to reduce American ownership in Canadian companies. I think nature has to take its course.”

    Since then, “nature” has been taking its course, in both directions. Three million, out of 35 million, Canadians live full or part time in the United States. Most retire in Sunbelt states, but there are an estimated 250,000 Canadians working in Los Angeles, another 250,000 in Silicon Valley and an estimated 400,000 per day work in Manhattan. This doesn’t include the million or so Canadians who became U.S. citizens before 1976, before dual citizenship was allowed.

    This north-south brain drain has been constant throughout Canada’s history. In 1900, Canada’s population was only 5.37 million people, and by 2000 seven million had immigrated to the United States. Millions of Americans have Canadian roots – including well-known figures like Ellen DeGeneres, Alec Baldwin, Vince Vaughn, Madonna, Angelina Jolie, Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin, Jack Kerouac, Walt Disney, Walter Chrysler and Thomas Edison.

    The flow of people has also drifted northward. More than 1 million Americans, like me, live in Canada, and our offspring, even if born in Canada, are entitled to U.S. citizenship. In addition, Canada’s 800,000 aboriginals, known as “First Nations,” are effectively American citizens by virtue of the 1794 Jay Treaty.

    Economically, the countries are one another’s biggest investors, customers and suppliers. Canada ships more oil to the United States than any other country, roughly 2.5 million barrels a day (out of the total consumed of 19.4 million barrels daily) and is an important source of electrical power, uranium, metals, minerals, natural gas and automobiles. In return, Canadians buy more U.S. products than does the entire EU.
    Much more - read the whole thing.

    Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/sto...#ixzz2ygwVSdv7
    "Alexa, slaughter the fatted calf."

  • #2
    I'm actually still rather fond of dixierat's idea of invading and annexing Mexico. It accomplishes a lot:
    • It solves the immigration problem of Mexicans in the US: they all become citizens, and thus subject to the same labor laws, taxation, etc. as present US citizens.
    • It cuts our border down to about 550 miles to protect, as opposed to about 1500 presently.
    • It gives us tremendous oil resources, such that we can be oil-independent almost immediately.
    • It basically nullifies NAFTA (personally, I don't care about this, but some people find it very important).
    • It means that we can impose some actual clean air restrictions on places like Mexico City for a change, which is much better for the planet.
    • Cancun as a spring break destination becomes domestic.
    • It means the end of the drug cartels.
    • Ultimately, it ends the rampant Mexican corruption. It replaces that with American corruption, but still....


    Sounds crazy at first, but when you really think about it, it actually makes a lot of sense.
    It's been ten years since that lonely day I left you
    In the morning rain, smoking gun in hand
    Ten lonely years but how my heart, it still remembers
    Pray for me, momma, I'm a gypsy now

    Comment


    • #3
      And, while we're at it, this is as good a place as any to continue to advocate for the one-state solution:

      It's been ten years since that lonely day I left you
      In the morning rain, smoking gun in hand
      Ten lonely years but how my heart, it still remembers
      Pray for me, momma, I'm a gypsy now

      Comment


      • #4
        It would be a good idea to merge with Canada and Mexico. We're already paying for regional defense of both, we might as well benefit from the natural resources.
        "Faith is nothing but a firm assent of the mind : which, if it be regulated, as is our duty, cannot be afforded to anything but upon good reason, and so cannot be opposite to it."
        -John Locke

        "It's all been melded together into one giant, authoritarian, leftist scream."
        -Newman

        Comment


        • #5
          how do you say eh in Spanish?
          Robert Francis O'Rourke, Democrat, White guy, spent ~78 million to defeat, Ted Cruz, Republican immigrant Dark guy …
          and lost …
          But the Republicans are racist.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Gramps View Post
            how do you say eh in Spanish?
            "pues?"
            "Since the historic ruling, the Lovings have become icons for equality. Mildred released a statement on the 40th anniversary of the ruling in 2007: 'I am proud that Richard’s and my name is on a court case that can help reinforce the love, the commitment, the fairness, and the family that so many people, Black or white, young or old, gay or straight, seek in life. I support the freedom to marry for all. That’s what Loving, and loving, are all about.'." - Mildred Loving (Loving v. Virginia)

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Adam View Post
              And, while we're at it, this is as good a place as any to continue to advocate for the one-state solution:

              OK, I enjoyed that.
              "Since the historic ruling, the Lovings have become icons for equality. Mildred released a statement on the 40th anniversary of the ruling in 2007: 'I am proud that Richard’s and my name is on a court case that can help reinforce the love, the commitment, the fairness, and the family that so many people, Black or white, young or old, gay or straight, seek in life. I support the freedom to marry for all. That’s what Loving, and loving, are all about.'." - Mildred Loving (Loving v. Virginia)

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Celeste Chalfonte View Post
                OK, I enjoyed that.
                It is funny. I don't completely agree with him, but it's a pretty funny video.
                It's been ten years since that lonely day I left you
                In the morning rain, smoking gun in hand
                Ten lonely years but how my heart, it still remembers
                Pray for me, momma, I'm a gypsy now

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by scott View Post
                  It would be a good idea to merge with Canada and Mexico. We're already paying for regional defense of both, we might as well benefit from the natural resources.
                  If I were Canadian, I doubt that I would see the benefit of opening the border to the worst America has to offer. I've always thought of Canada as our fallback position when the US is no longer habitable.
                  The year's at the spring
                  And day's at the morn;
                  Morning's at seven;
                  The hill-side's dew-pearled;
                  The lark's on the wing;
                  The snail's on the thorn:
                  God's in his heaven—
                  All's right with the world!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Adam View Post
                    And, while we're at it, this is as good a place as any to continue to advocate for the one-state solution:

                    Funny.
                    Not where I breathe, but where I love, I live...
                    Robert Southwell, S.J.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Adam View Post
                      And, while we're at it, this is as good a place as any to continue to advocate for the one-state solution:

                      Meh. Generic "fellate Israel or you're anti-Semitic."
                      Colonel Vogel : What does the diary tell you that it doesn't tell us?

                      Professor Henry Jones : It tells me, that goose-stepping morons like yourself should try *reading* books instead of *burning* them!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Billy Jingo View Post
                        Meh. Generic "fellate Israel or you're anti-Semitic."
                        I'm sure it's easy to make excuses for violent theocracies from the safety of the middle of this continent. I'm no Israel cheerleader and I wouldn't want to live there, but given a choice between Israel and pretty much everything else in the Middle East? No contest, especially for a woman or any gay person.
                        "Since the historic ruling, the Lovings have become icons for equality. Mildred released a statement on the 40th anniversary of the ruling in 2007: 'I am proud that Richard’s and my name is on a court case that can help reinforce the love, the commitment, the fairness, and the family that so many people, Black or white, young or old, gay or straight, seek in life. I support the freedom to marry for all. That’s what Loving, and loving, are all about.'." - Mildred Loving (Loving v. Virginia)

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Billy Jingo View Post
                          Meh. Generic "fellate Israel or you're anti-Semitic."
                          Where does it even come close to saying that?

                          The video accurately notes the freedom Israel grants residents regardless of religion. That's simply not true in most of the Arab Middle East.
                          "Faith is nothing but a firm assent of the mind : which, if it be regulated, as is our duty, cannot be afforded to anything but upon good reason, and so cannot be opposite to it."
                          -John Locke

                          "It's all been melded together into one giant, authoritarian, leftist scream."
                          -Newman

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by scott View Post
                            Where does it even come close to saying that?

                            The video accurately notes the freedom Israel grants residents regardless of religion. That's simply not true in most of the Arab Middle East.
                            As much as I adore Israel and despise Islam, I can't figure out how Israel stays a Jewish state, or a civilized one, if they give citizenship to Muslims. Won't the Muslims outbreed them?
                            The year's at the spring
                            And day's at the morn;
                            Morning's at seven;
                            The hill-side's dew-pearled;
                            The lark's on the wing;
                            The snail's on the thorn:
                            God's in his heaven—
                            All's right with the world!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Adam View Post
                              And, while we're at it, this is as good a place as any to continue to advocate for the one-state solution:

                              Okay, that's funny.

                              My sister came up with an idea that I sort of thought was funny. Give Israel Texas. If Texas was part of Israel, they'd kick butt and the problems would be solved.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X